Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor of Handicrafts Department, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, Iran.

Abstract

The pictures of women in pictorial carpets were mostly woven in the form of mythological figures or images of European women in the Qajar era. Among these carpets influenced by both of discourses there is a carpet with a woven image in a seating position, which is preserved in the ‘Ahadzadeh Gallery’. This work is highly similar to the carpet of the queen of Armenia. It is also influenced by the ‘world carpet’ in which world is placed on the back of the cow-fish.Considering that this carpet is inspired by carpets with a mythological concept and picture of a woman, therefore, in this study the relationship between different texts is being addressed. The research also aims to review and study the connections between the England's ‘Queen carpet’ and the ‘world carpet’ with the carpet preserved in the ‘Ahadzadeh Gallery’; the study targets the following question 1. how the relationship between these carpets could be justified, considering the European and mythological concepts behind those two carpets? 2. What changes have occurred in the process of establishing these relationships? This study is performed based on a descriptive-comparative research method and analyzes outcomes according to the hyper-textuality concept of Genet. The findings of the research indicate that there are two kind of relationship between the existing texts of hypotext and hypertext, 1. Imitative or homotextuaity relationships and 2. Changed relationship. The relationship between the first and third text is kind of ‘hypertextuality’ and the relationship between the second and third text is kind of ‘intertextuality’. Also there is a transtextuality between the first and the third texts as there has been a change in both the style and the content of the text, as the new text does not only addresses one discourse, but also interpret a connection between the two discourses of Archo-Eropean, and the target carpet has acquired a new identity.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
Azizi, H., & Dahdahjani, Z. (2020). The manifestation of “cow-fish” myth in Iranian art on the basis of ancient sources, with an emphasis on pictorial rugs. Journal of Iranian Handicraft Studies, 3(1), 163-174. (In Persian)
Chitsaz, Sh., Nedaeifard, A., & Namvar Motlagh, B. (2019). An inter-textual reading and interpretation of pomegranate motif in contemporary jewelry of iran based on archeological pretexts. Bagh Nazar, 16(77), 5-43. (In Persian)
Ettinghausen, R. (1979). Lion rugs from Fars. translated by Parviz Tanavoli and Sirous Parham. Tehran: Shahrabanoo Foundation and Art Festival Organization. (In Persian)
Genette, G. (1997). Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. University of Nebraska Press.
Ghaem Magham, J. (1966). The lion and its role in Aryan beliefs. Historical Reviews, 1(3), 91-142. (In Persian)
Graham, A. (1993). Intertxtuality. London & New York: Routlrdge.
Razi, H. (2002). Recherches sur le cult public et des mysteres. Tehtan: Behjat. (In Persian)
Mahvan, F., Yahaghi, M. J., & Ghaemi, F. (2015). The study of symbolic imagery of far (in connection with the image in Shahnameh). Epic Literature, 11(19), 119-157. (In Persian)
Mirenayat, S. A., & Soofastaei, E. (2015). Gerard Genette and the categorization of textual transcendence. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 533.
Moin, M. (2003). Moin Encyclopedic Dictionary. Tehran: Sigol. (in Persian)
Naamvar Motlagh, B. (2017). Intertextuality: from structuralism to postmodernism. Tehran: Sokhan. (In Persian)
Naamvar Motlagh, B. (2013). An introduction to mythology. Tehran: Sokhan. (In Persian)
Naamvar Motlagh, B. (2012). Hypertext typology. Literary Research Quarterly, 9(8), 139-152. (In Persian)
Naamvar Motlagh, B. (2016). An introduction to intertextuality (2nd ed). Tehran: Sokhan. (In Persian)
Namvar Motlagh, B. (2008). Transtextual Study. Human Sciences, 56, 83-98. (In Persian)
Naamvar Motlagh, B., (2017). Intertextuality: from structuralism to postmodernism, Tehran: Sokhan. (In Persian)
Olmstead, A. T. E. (2009). The history of the Persian empire: Achaemenid period. Translated by: Mohamad Yahaghi. Tehran: Scientific and cultural publications.
Papadopoulo, A. (1994). Islam and Muslim Art. Translated by: R. Erich Wolf. Reissue Edition: Harry N. Abrams, INC.
Sohrabi, M., Namvar Motlagh, B., Mehrabi, F. (2019). dialogism of the dominant archimyths on the art of the qajar period and its role in illustrating “shirin” character. Journal of Woman in Culture and Arts, 11(2), 179-197. (In Persian)
Shahcheragh, S. M., Taheri, A., Shamili, F., & Dadvar, A. (2021). Iconographic analysis of Ravar’s “Layla’s Camel” Intra-hybrid Rug. Goljaam, 16(38), 77-95. (In Persian)
Tavakoli-Taraghi, M. (2011). Refashioning Iran, Orientalism. Occidertalism and Historiography. Information Magazine of Wisdom and Knowledge, 6(5), 25-27. (In Persian)
Vermazen, M. (2004), Mithra, cedieu Mysterieux. Translated by: B. Naderzadeh. Tehran: Cheshmeh Publication. (In Persian)
Yahaghi, M. J. (2007). The culture of mythology and storytelling in Persian literature. Tehran: Contemporary. (In Persian)